VisionList
Learn / Big Topics

The 6 big topics every CXO/AI Lead will face as AI becomes operational

AI is now capable of influencing real business outcomes — but most teams are missing the same prerequisite: a maintained context layer that makes intent, constraints, and decision logic explicit. These six topics show where AI initiatives usually break, and what a context-first operating model resolves.

Explore Done-With-YouSee how it works

How to use this page

If you're a COO (or advising one), treat this as a conversation starter. The goal isn't to "buy tools" — it's to identify where AI creates risk, where it creates leverage, and what must be made explicit before autonomy scales.

Signal

AI is moving from assistance to execution.

Problem

Most businesses never define the context AI must operate within.

Resolution

Adopt a context-first operating model that preserves intent and governance.

Level 01

Business knowledge → operating asset

Productise what the business knows so it compounds.

Why it matters

Critical knowledge lives in people's heads, scattered docs, and tribal memory — which doesn't scale as execution speeds up.

What it looks like

New hires ramp slowly, AI outputs feel generic, and the business keeps rediscovering the same insights (or repeating the same mistakes).

Why context is the solution

Raw data describes activity. Context explains meaning. Turning business knowledge into explicit context is what converts tribal understanding into something AI can reason with and reuse.

Questions to pressure-test
  • Which business knowledge is mission-critical, but not written down?
  • What would break if two key people left tomorrow?
  • Do you treat business knowledge as an asset with an owner?
Context control score

1 — Critical business knowledge lives in people's heads or scattered documents

10 — Core business knowledge is structured, shared, and reusable across decisions and AI systems

Level 02

From local optimisation → continuity and audit trail

Stop resetting decisions. Start compounding them.

Why it matters

Teams optimise locally (a prompt, a workflow, a tool) while the bigger picture keeps drifting. Decisions reset because reasoning isn't captured.

What it looks like

PRDs and implementation drift apart, pilots look impressive but don't compound, and work gets re-litigated every few weeks.

Why context is the solution

Decisions without context decay into outcomes without explanation. Context preserves intent, not just results — enabling traceability, learning, and accountability over time.

Questions to pressure-test
  • Do you have a durable record of why key decisions were made?
  • Where does 'truth' live when different teams disagree?
  • How often do projects stall due to misalignment, not effort?
Context control score

1 — Decisions are made in isolation with no lasting record or rationale

10 — Decisions are traceable, explainable, and connected over time through shared context

Level 03

Directional resilience — moving fast with purpose

Keep adaptation coherent even as the pace increases.

Why it matters

In fast-moving markets, the biggest risk is not moving too slowly — it's reacting without coherence. As signals multiply and AI accelerates execution, organisations can change direction faster than they can explain why.

What it looks like

Teams respond to new inputs constantly — market noise, internal data, AI recommendations — but without a stable reference point. Strategy shifts subtly, priorities blur, and momentum is mistaken for progress.

Why context is the solution

When intent is durable, adaptation doesn't equal drift. Context allows change without identity loss — enabling speed with coherence instead of reactive motion.

Questions to pressure-test
  • When conditions change, what must remain true?
  • How do you distinguish deliberate adaptation from reactive drift?
  • If AI proposes a new direction, what context does it reference to justify the change?
Context control score

1 — Direction shifts reactively based on noise or short-term signals

10 — Teams and AI adapt continuously while preserving strategic intent through durable context

Level 04

Identify what should be automated (and what shouldn't)

Automation is downstream of clarity.

Why it matters

Most organisations automate what's visible (tasks), not what matters (outcomes). Without context, automation amplifies ambiguity.

What it looks like

Agents are built before requirements are defined, data ingestion is bloated, and teams end up maintaining fragile prompt chains.

Why context is the solution

Automation without context optimises the wrong thing faster. Context defines readiness, risk, and dependency — allowing automation to be sequenced rather than guessed.

Questions to pressure-test
  • How do you decide what deserves automation first?
  • Do you have explicit success criteria for each automation?
  • Which automations increased workload instead of reducing it?
Context control score

1 — Automation decisions are reactive or tool-driven

10 — Automation is introduced deliberately, based on explicit intent, constraints, and readiness

Level 05

Autonomous execution without losing accountability

Autonomy is earned through governed context.

Why it matters

The future is not 'more prompts'. It's AI systems that propose actions, run cycles, and escalate exceptions — but only inside known constraints.

What it looks like

Teams want autonomy but fear loss of control. AI outputs vary, responsibility is unclear, and leaders hesitate to trust AI in production.

Why context is the solution

Autonomy requires explicit ownership, boundaries, and escalation logic. Context is what lets agents act on behalf of the organisation rather than instead of it.

Questions to pressure-test
  • What would make you trust an agent to run a workflow end-to-end?
  • What must an agent never do without approval?
  • How will accountability work when agents talk to other agents?
Context control score

1 — No clear accountability once AI or agents act

10 — Accountability, escalation, and decision ownership are explicitly defined and enforced by context

Level 06

AI governance, compliance, and ethics

Control, auditability, and safe boundaries as AI scales.

Why it matters

Most organisations deploy AI faster than they can govern it. Policies exist, but intent, constraints, and escalation rules aren't operationalised.

What it looks like

Inconsistent decisions, approvals handled ad-hoc, unclear accountability, and growing governance risk as more workflows become AI-assisted.

Why context is the solution

Governance is impossible if rules, boundaries, and escalation paths are implicit. Context makes policy operational — readable by humans and enforceable by AI. Without it, 'ethics' stays aspirational.

Questions to pressure-test
  • Where do your AI systems get their boundaries from today?
  • If an AI-driven decision goes wrong, can you trace why it happened?
  • Who owns escalation and exception handling?
Context control score

1 — No formal AI governance, decision boundaries, or escalation rules defined

10 — Governance is explicit, auditable, and embedded in shared context used by teams and AI

The quick gut-check

Use these prompts to sanity-check whether each topic is truly controlled. The left column is the operating gap, the right column is the simplest way to pressure-test it.

Big Topic
Big Question

01Business knowledge → operating asset

What must AI understand about how this business actually works?

02From local optimisation → continuity and audit trail

Can we explain why this decision was made six months from now?

03Directional resilience — moving fast with purpose

Are we still solving the right problem?

04Identify what should be automated (and what shouldn't)

Should this even be automated yet?

05Autonomous execution without losing accountability

Who is accountable if this goes wrong — and how do we know?

06AI governance, compliance, and ethics

What is AI allowed to do, decide, or recommend — and where must it stop?

Want to sanity-check this with you

If you're operating AI inside a real business, I'd value your perspective: Which of these five topics feels most urgent in your environment — and which feels overblown? A short reply is enough.

Explore Done-With-YouShare feedback